RE: Thats Baloney!!!

wow..that came NOW !!!

 

Mayank Raja
Asyst Technologies Inc.
48761 Kato Road, Fremont, CA 94538.
ph: 510 661 3441 fax: 510 661 5101

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Raja, Mayank
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 9:22 AM
To: 'Sanghvi, Kuntal'; Raja, Mayank; Mallu; Binod Tripathi
Cc: ajay.belambe@gmail.com; iftekharkazi@gmail.com; globalcor@yahoo.com; kevinjr@gmail.com; paniwalaia@msx.upmc.edu; rjoshi@us.ibm.com; sangivp@aol.com; kmadhu@aol.com; naishadh.somaiya@nttaus.com.au
Subject: RE: Thats Baloney!!!

USD....United States of Desistan

Mayank Raja
Asyst Technologies Inc.
48761 Kato Road, Fremont, CA 94538.
ph: 510 661 3441 fax: 510 661 5101

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanghvi, Kuntal [mailto:Kuntal_Sanghvi@acml.com]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 9:12 AM
To: Raja, Mayank; Mallu; Binod Tripathi
Cc: ajay.belambe@gmail.com; iftekharkazi@gmail.com; globalcor@yahoo.com; kevinjr@gmail.com; paniwalaia@msx.upmc.edu; rjoshi@us.ibm.com; sangivp@aol.com; kmadhu@aol.com; naishadh.somaiya@nttaus.com.au
Subject: RE: Thats Baloney!!!

what's next ? hyderabad ? aurangabad ? ahmedabad ? where does it stop ?

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Raja, Mayank [mailto:mraja@Asyst.com]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 12:12 PM
To: 'Mallu'; Binod Tripathi
Cc: ajay.belambe@gmail.com; iftekharkazi@gmail.com; globalcor@yahoo.com; kevinjr@gmail.com; paniwalaia@msx.upmc.edu; rjoshi@us.ibm.com; sangivp@aol.com; Sanghvi, Kuntal; kmadhu@aol.com; naishadh.somaiya@nttaus.com.au
Subject: RE: Thats Baloney!!!

although most of the times I think J&K is integral part of india, sometimes I tend think, is it worth losing thousads of lives ? Just give kashmir to pak. And if kashmiris don't like it..too bad, thay can then fight to be independent..or just let Kashmir be independent, whether with POK or not..and jammu be with us. end of story.

Mayank Raja
Asyst Technologies Inc.
48761 Kato Road, Fremont, CA 94538.
ph: 510 661 3441 fax: 510 661 5101

-----Original Message-----
From: Mallu [mailto:vnair68@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 8:45 AM
To: Binod Tripathi
Cc: ajay.belambe@gmail.com; iftekharkazi@gmail.com; globalcor@yahoo.com;
kevinjr@gmail.com; mraja@asyst.com; paniwalaia@msx.upmc.edu;
rjoshi@us.ibm.com; sangivp@aol.com; kuntal.sanghvi@acml.com;
kmadhu@aol.com; naishadh.somaiya@nttaus.com.au
Subject: Thats Baloney!!!

'What is good for Pak is good for Kashmiris'

PTI[ MONDAY, JUNE 28, 2004 04:44:48 PM ]
 
 
Indian Foreign Secretary Shashank (L) with Riaz Khokhar 
NEW DELHI: Pakistan on Monday suggested the establishment of a
mechanism to involve the people of Jammu and Kashmir "at some stage"
in the dialogue process to resolve the vexed issue, and said whatever
satisfied Islamabad would satisfy Kashmiris.

"At some stage and point we must come up with a mechanism to associate
representatives of the Kashmiri people because it is their fate that
you are deciding and they must be associated with the process. It is
the most desirable thing to do," Pakistan Foreign Office spokesman
Masood Khan told reporters at the end of the two-day Foreign Secretary
level talks between the two countries.

"But as of now there is no such mechanism. But as you go down the
slope of dialogue and confidence building, you can come up with a
mechanism if there is the requisite goodwill, understanding and
momentum," he said.

Asked if such a mechanism was "mandatory", Khan said it was "imperative".

When pointed out that the Joint Statement issued after the talks
mentioned that the Kashmir issue should be resolved to the
"satisfaction of both sides", he said "what satisfies Pakistan will
ultimately satisfy the Kashmiris. That's the simple answer".

Khan said there were three parties to the dispute and "when you are
resolving the issue, it would be both advisable and sagacious to
consult the people of Jammu and Kashmir because they are the ones who
are to decide their future political dispensation".

-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Please note that we do not accept account orders and/or instructions by e-mail, and therefore will not be responsible for carrying out such orders and/or instructions.
If you, as the intended recipient of this message, the purpose of which is to inform and update our clients, prospects and consultants of developments relating to our services and products, would not like to receive further e-mail correspondence from the sender, please "reply" to the sender indicating your wishes. In the U.S.: 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10105.